Posts
However, one other issue that has arisen during our class discussions is how one labels themself. Identity is an issue that all of these women grapple with as rights are being stripped from them everyday and they are working to retain who they really are. Labels, and the language used with them, are major factors in who we are and how we claim our identity. Below is a video from the recent 2010 census regarding ethnic labels and how one identifies themself on the census:
These women in Reading Lolita in Tehran have a multitude of different ways in which they can label and identify themselves. "Female" is an obvious, first label, but where do they go from there? Are they Persian? Are they Muslim? Are they Arabic? Are they Iranian? You get the point. Any way you look at it, any of us could fall under multiple labels or identities. Is their nationality their most important label? If your nationality is your most important label, does that mean you don't qualify under the other identities as well? I think not. I think it is possible for all of your labels to be equally important. However, I think society and the world makes it hard for you to not be casted into an "other" category if you don't fit some of society's most defined labels. Below is a video from a very old song that talks about the special significance of the label of nationality for someone:
What happens if you don't fit the "normal" labels? In class today, we brainstormed a list of "normal" American labels and came up with:
- middle class
- ambitious
- white
- Christian, protestant
- heterosexual
- English-speaking
- male
- businessman
We discussed what happens if you don't fit those labels and talked about the idea of the "other" group, the group of people who might be immigrants or poets or gay. Labels, and the idea of labeling oneself based on who they are, may be beneficial in some cases such as censuses, but can be detrimental to people if these "other" labels affect their identity and how they see themselves as people.
I think it's really insightful how you mention that people arent able to move beyond typical stereotypes and arent able move beyond labels, therefore it can be really detrimental on people and their personal views of themselves. I would like to focus on the fact that you mentioned that people were being labeled based on gender and then nationality and religion and then that becomes their identity. It would be really great if you could see this video about this guy and his theory on an empathic civilization. He explains that human are scientifically soft-wired to empathize with other humans, and its this empathy that bring us together and helps us help and understand others. He goes on explaning how the human mind has actually created fictions such as nationality and culture, and these are the things that are stopping us from connecting as one human race and stopping us from moving beyond stereotypes and labels and the comforts of the desire to be "normal". He continues with his theory with the idea that if humans can move empathetic relations and connection from blood ites from the cave man period, to religious ties, to then nationality ties, why cant we all move even beyond nationality and empathize and identify ourselves as one human race. It's a really cool video, i think you will enjoy it http://www.ted.com/talks/jeremy_rifkin_on_the_empathic_civilization.html .
ReplyDeletedaminikgt--Humanity/Hope/Human Spirit
Your post was really thought provoking for me, and I really agree with you. I feel like when you label yourself, you feel as if you need to live your life within that label all the time. When you label yourself as goth, you need to listen to metal all the time and wear black 24/7. When you label yourself as preppy, it's pastels and Ralph Lauren for you. I feel like we don't need labels in our society, we should simply live life the way we want to live without trying to put our entire personality into one single word.
ReplyDelete